ETF vs Real Estate Simulator
Which investment builds more wealth?
Compare the passive growth of ETFs against the leverage and cash flow of real estate.
Run a Side-by-Side Wealth Comparison
Model ETF and real estate outcomes with the same starting cash, then stress test assumptions to see what actually drives the winner.
Use this for
- Allocation decisions for long-term investing
- Rental underwriting sanity checks
- Testing required rent or appreciation targets
You will get
- Winner by total ending value
- Scenario sensitivity impacts
- Break-even rent and appreciation thresholds
Quick Result
Current winner
Real Estate
Outperforms by $128,185.50 over 10 years
Based on
- • Starting cash: $50,000.00
- • Horizon: 10 years
- • ETF net return: 6.90%
- • Rent: $2,000.00/month, appreciation: 3%
Investment Basics
Used for both ETF and real estate (all-cash)
ETF Assumptions
Real Estate Assumptions
Based on Available Cash used for Downpayment + Closing Costs
After 10 years, Real Estate outperforms by $128,185.50.
Total Difference
ETF Future Value
$97,442.19
Net CAGR: 6.90%
Real Estate Value
$225,627.69
Annualized: 16.26%
Performance Comparison
Total Portfolio Value Over Time
Real Estate Breakdown
Matched Criteria
Sensitivity Analysis (Impact on Total Value)
This tool is for illustrative purposes only and does not constitute professional financial, tax, or legal advice. Calculations are estimates and may not reflect real-world variables or local regulations. Always consult with a qualified professional before making financial decisions.
Methodology and Trust
Formulas
ETF future value
futureValue = availableCash × (1 + (etfReturn - etfFee)/100)^years
Rental NOI
NOI = effectiveRent - operatingExpenses, where effectiveRent = annualRent × (1 - vacancyRate)
Real estate total value
totalValue = totalCashFlow + (salePrice - sellingCosts)
Recommended Next Steps
Continue your journey with these related tools
The Great Debate: ETF vs. Physical Real Estate (2026 Edition)
Key Insights & Concepts
This is perhaps the oldest argument in investing. In one corner, you have the S&P 500 (ETF): the champion of passive, liquid, "set it and forget it" wealth building. In the other, Physical Real Estate: the titan of tangible assets, tax advantages, and leverage.
Most comparisons are flawed because they compare leveraged real estate (putting 20% down) to unleveraged stocks. That is comparing apples to hand grenades. This calculator fixes that by forcing an all-cash comparison first. Once you understand the base-case economics, you can layer risk (leverage) on top.
1. The Asset Class DNA: Passive vs. Active
The ETF (Stock Market)
- ✓True Passivity: You buy it, you wait. No toilets to fix, no tenants to evict, no roofs to patch.
- ✓Infinite Liquidity: You can convert $1M of SPY to cash in 3 seconds on your phone.
- ✓Cost Efficiency: Expense ratios are often <0.05%. There are no closing costs, agent fees (mostly), or insurance premiums.
Physical Real Estate
- ✓Control: You are the CEO. You can "force appreciation" by renovating or improving management.
- ✓Tax Alpha: Depreciation, 1031 exchanges, and stepped-up basis offer tax shields that stocks cannot match.
- ✓Inefficient Markets: You can find a "deal" in real estate (buying below market value). You cannot find "discounted Apple stock."
2. The "Silent Killers" of Real Estate Returns
When your cousin brags about selling a house for $500k that he bought for $300k, he is usually doing "Napkin Math." He ignores the silent killers that this calculator exposes.
A. The Phantom Expenses (CapEx)
A roof lasts 20 years. A furnace lasts 15. Real estate investors often calculate "profit" as Rent minus Mortgage minus Management. They forget to set aside $200-$400/month for the inevitable "Capital Expenditures" (CapEx).
Rule of Thumb: If you aren't reserving at least 10-15% of gross rent for repairs and CapEx, your projected return is a lie.
B. The Vacancy Drag
A 5% vacancy rate sounds low, but it's nearly 3 weeks of empty property per year. In high-turnover rentals, one month of vacancy (8.3% of the year) wipes out your entire profit margin for that year.
The ETF never has a vacancy. It pays dividends rain or shine.
C. Transaction Friction
Buying and selling a stock costs $0. Buying and selling a house costs ~8-10% of the asset's value (Agent fees, transfer taxes, title insurance, closing costs).
The implication: Real Estate is a terrible short-term investment. You need years of appreciation just to break even on the transaction costs.
3. Why Bother with Real Estate? (The "Alpha")
If ETFs are cheaper, easier, and more liquid, why do the wealthy love real estate?
1. Leverage (OPM)
You can buy a $500k asset with $100k cash. If the asset appreciates 5%, you made $25k. That is a 25% return on your cash (before fees), not 5%. The bank takes the risk of the bulk capital, you keep the upside. You cannot safely leverage stocks 5:1.
2. Tax Depreciation
The IRS allows you to deduct the "wear and tear" of the building (phantom loss) against your rental income. You can often show a "loss" on your tax return (paying $0 tax) while actually having positive cash flow in your bank account.
The Verdict
Buy Real Estate if you want a business. You are willing to trade liquidity and time for tax benefits, control, and the power of leverage.
Buy ETFs if you want an investment. You want to compound wealth silently in the background while you focus on your primary career, family, and life.